Two local legislators endorse I-502: the legalization of recreational marijuana sales

The Highline Times

This article was published in partnership with the Highline Times and was written by Ty Swenson.

New Approach Washington, the lobbying force behind Initiative 502 to legalize, regulate, and tax marijuana sales for adults 21 years and older, sent out word this week that sixteen Washington state legislators endorsed the initiative, including two local legislators.

I-502 will appear on the November general election ballot.

Locally, Senator Sharon Nelson (D-34) and Representative Joe Fitzgibbon (D-34) announced their endorsement.

Representative Eileen Cody (D-34) has not endorsed the initiative and said in an email, “I don’t think marijuana use should be illegal but I also don’t want to encourage its use. It is helpful in some medical conditions but I don’t support its recreational use any more than I do tobacco use. I really support the Governor’s approach of getting the FDA to reclassify marijuana so that it could be handled through pharmacies and prescribed when needed.”

Rep. Fitzgibbon wrote the following of his support in an email to the Times/News:

“I am supporting I-502 because our nation’s drug policy is an abject failure. We jail thousands of people and spend millions of taxpayer dollars on a prohibition policy that we have known since the 1920s does not work. What does work is prevention, to keep kids from starting using harmful drugs in the first place. The law enforcement resources freed up by I-502, as well as the new revenue it generates, would be far better spent on serious crime and on marijuana, alcohol, and tobacco prevention programs that have been proven to work.”

Senator Nelson was unavailable for comment due to a family emergency.

If I-502 passes, here is how it would work, according to New Approach Washington: “Privately owned and operated standalone, marijuana-only stores would be licensed to sell limited quantities of marijuana to adults 21 and over. Washington growers and processors would be licensed to provide marijuana to the stores. Advertising would be restricted, and a new DUI threshold for THC, the psychoactive component of marijuana, would operate like the .08 threshold for alcohol to keep impaired drivers off the streets.”

Anyone over 21 would be allowed to possess up to one ounce of smoke-able marijuana, 16 ounces of marijuana-infused food (such as brownies or cookies), and 72 ounces of pot-infused liquids (such as teas or lotions).

Eighty percent of taxed marijuana sales “would be dedicated to health care, prevention, research, and education,” with the remainder going into the state’s general fund and local budgets, according to New Approach. The Washington State Office of Financial Management estimates I-502 could generate $560 million in annual tax revenue.

While I-502 is separate from Washington’s medical marijuana laws, Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-36) said there is crossover protection in a press release, stating, “… patients would finally have protection from arrest for possessing marijuana. They would also have safe access to quality-controlled marijuana locally grown and sold by licensed Washington businesses.”

Opposition to I-502
Three main arguments against I-502 have arisen, including fear it will make marijuana more easily accessible to those under 21, worries the black market will continue to flourish by simply undercutting the price of legal sales, and – the argument that has certainly had the most media coverage – concerns that a DUI provision will put regular, medical users at an unfair risk of being arrested.

“I-502 establishes a marijuana DUI cut-off of 5 nanograms of active THC metabolite per milliliter of whole blood (5 ng/mL), analogous to the per se 0.08 BAC cut-off for alcohol,” according to New Approach. Officers would still need probable cause in a traffic stop to call for the blood test. Alison Holcomb with New Approach said after smoking marijuana, it would take the average person three to four hours to drop below the 5 nanogram threshold.

In an opinion piece ran by The Stranger, Dr. Richard Bayer put the concern thusly: “Patients who use cannabis regularly develop tolerance to the psychoactive or behavioral effects of marijuana even though blood THC levels may never drop to zero. A major flaw in I-502 is the sponsors failed to test any doctor-approved medical marijuana patients to determine how tolerance affects blood THC concentration.”

Rep. Fitzgibbon took the time to address all three concerns listed above. Here are his comments:

DUI provision
“I believe having a threshold for active THC in the bloodstream is an appropriate and necessary way to keep unsafe drivers off the roads. There is no doubt that smoking marijuana impairs driving abilities, even for experienced users such as medical marijuana patients, and I have zero tolerance for drivers who make our roads unsafe for other users.”

The black market
“The black market is flourishing today. That is why Mexico is in the midst of an incredibly bloody drug war and why drug cartels and other criminal enterprises get rich off of selling marijuana. By bringing that industry out of the shadows and into a regulated marketplace, we deprive drug cartels and criminal organizations of a major source of income.”

Marijuana and minors
“Finally, marijuana is available to minors today, often more available than tobacco or alcohol, which are much more strictly controlled with ID checks. No drug dealer ever checks the ID of a high school student who is trying to buy marijuana. Like alcohol is today, marijuana will be more difficult for minors to get a hold of if it is taken out of the hands of street gangs and criminals and put into a heavily regulated marketplace. In addition, the new revenues derived from legal marijuana sales will help fund prevention programs to keep kids off of marijuana, tobacco, and alcohol.”

Here is the full endorsement list for I-502:

Rep. Sherry Appleton (D-23)
Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-36)
Sen. Maralyn Chase (D-32)
Rep. Luis Moscoso (D-1)
Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson (D-36)
Sen. Sharon Nelson (D-34)
Rep. Hans Dunshee (D-44)
Rep. Jamie Pedersen (D-43)
Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon (D-34)
Sen. Margarita Prentice (D-11)
Rep. Roger Goodman (D-45)
Rep. Chris Reykdal (D-22)
Rep. Bob Hasegawa (D-11)
Rep. Mary Helen Roberts (D-21)
Sen. Adam Kline (D-37)
Rep. Cindy Ryu (D-32)

To read I-502 in its entirety, please click here.

Comments (19)
  • Coverofnight

    At the Brand X Blog, I posted,
     
    Guess I’ll be campaigning against Nelson and Fitzgibbon in their
    re-election efforts! Amazing how they spin the money angle to garner
    support for legalizing marijuana use. It needs to stay illegal and
    instead let’s focus our money and governing on educating our kids to the
    dangers of drugs and addiction. All hardcore drug users got their
    start on marijuana. The drug experimentation of the ’60′s has led this
    country down the toilet to the state it’s in today. This legalization
    is another step in the process by the liberals to destroy this country!
    I shake my head in frustration as the liberals focus on contraception
    while the death and destruction from the drug trade goes unchecked.
    My question to ANYONE supporting these Democrat values – what the he!! is wrong with you?!

    What do you say on this issue to YOUR kids, Joey Moretaxes?

    And the response to the Brand X poll was roughly 84% supporting the legislation.  Guess I’m surprised that I’m surrounded by so many loser potheads!  And what also amazed me is that my post was to stress the importance of taking the anti-drug message to the kids and educate them to the dangers of drugs; this will minimize demand and use in this country.  Yet all the posts against me focused on seemingly straw man arguments to justify their personal use of marijuana.  Sorry folks, you’re just deceiving yourself and doing a disservice to your kids.  Go back to your commune if you just want to stay high – that’s right, I said it!

    The full endorsement list – all democrats….I wonder how all these coneheads ever get elected; guess I know now – the 84% above keep voting them in.  Maybe we should have drug tests before a person votes……!

    (And Joey, I’m still waiting for your take on this issue!)

  • http://www.facebook.com/jjjjmartinez Joey Martinez

    CON, I thought you were for a smaller government with less taxes? A HUGH portion of your taxes go to lock up people who smoke weed. I say treat, regulate, and tax it JUST LIKE Tobacco and Alcohol. Prohibition didn’t work in the 20′s yet we continue to fight this “war on drugs” which is really just a war against fellow Americans.
     
    Let’s get Government out of People’s lives!

  • Coverofnight

     Joey, what, were you high when you wrote that comment?  Did you even bother to read my post where I stress the anti-drug message to our children?  That is the cheapest, most cost-effective way to fight the “war on drugs”; gee, what a novel idea – less government because of less demand for illegal drugs!  Worth a try, don’t you think?  No, instead I just get the typical liberal, selfish arguments from individuals that don’t want to see their vice disrupted.  Same thing with gay marriage……but we’ll save that for another article.

    You know Joey, I can tolerate your inane arguments regarding various issues, but I certainly hope you re-consider your views on this issue relative to your own family and loved ones.  As I’ve stated, drugs have destroyed so many families – I don’t see any amount of tax revenue worth the risk of legalizing marijuana use.

  • Pingback: How to Vegetable Garden in the Month of September · How to Vegetable Garden

  • http://www.facebook.com/jjjjmartinez Joey Martinez

    CON, here is the thing, this country has been trying the “Just say No” bit since Saint Reagan and it hasn’t worked. A definition of insanity is to keep trying the same thing and expect different results.
     
    The Federal Government spent over $15 BILLION dollars on the war against Americans last year. What we got for $15,000,000,000 was increased murders, increased robberies, increased crime, and increased Americans going to jail. We also had an increase in Police Corruption due to drugs. We got a border war in Mexico with them trying to supply the demand that has claimed thousands of people.
     
    Other countries have stopped treating use as a crime and instead started treating the negative effects of the use and they’ve become a SAFER country as a result.
     
    I believe that alcohol is a much more dangerous drug and we tried banning it. That gave us infamous gangsters like Al Capone. How many police officers died because of prohibition in the ’20s? How many have died because of marijuana? Over something a strong minority of American’s WANT to do.
     
    I have also seen the negative effects of drugs in a community. The biggest problem are the pushers on the street. Take away their monopoly on the street and we see the biggest problems go away. We can focus those resources instead on treatment of the problem JUST like with Alcohol.

    Joey Martinez

  • PreventionFirst

    While teenagers report that marijuana is as easy to get as alcohol, legal and regulated alcohol is used at much higher rates among teens than marijuana.  (See the Washington State Healthy Youth Survey for data: http://www.AskHYS.net.)  If legalized, marijuana will become much more accessible to the general public and, therefore, to youth.  Most teenagers do not get alcohol by buying it, they get it other ways such as through friends, at parties, and from home with or without their parents knowledge.  If we treat marijuana like we treat alcohol, kids will get marijuana the same way that they get alcohol now.    

    While alcohol is the #1 drug of choice among teenagers, marijuana is the primary reason that King County youth seek substance abuse treatment.  This is different than adults who seek treatment primarily for alcohol-related problems.  (See King County treatment data at http://adai.washington.edu/pubs/)  

    In Washington State, more than 60% of youth who need substance abuse treatment and do not have private insurance cannot access treatment.  (See http://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/dbhr/2010%20Trends%20Report%20links.pdf)  Funding for youth treatment is not included in the legalization initiative.  

    Finally, as we have witnessed with other “dedicated” funds that are to go toward prevention, it doesn’t take long for the legislature to divert them to the general fund.  Our state was very successful in reducing tobacco use rates when tobacco taxes went towards prevention.  The state legislature raided the tobacco account and very little money now goes toward tobacco prevention.  Some alcohol taxes used to go towards underage drinking prevention.  That revenue now goes to the general fund, as well.  While the initiative that will be voted upon in November has dedicated some of the revenue to go towards prevention, it would not be long before the legislature diverted that money to the general fund, a well.  

  • Pingback: Skull Candy Headphones

  • Pingback: How to Vegetable Garden in December · How to Vegetable Garden

  • Pingback: xbox 360

  • Pingback: Kazuko Krumins

  • Pingback: free xbox360

  • Pingback: xbox 360

  • Pingback: xbox360

  • Pingback: cheap xbox360

  • Pingback: free xbox

  • Pingback: cheap xbox 360

  • Pingback: Erik Andregg

  • Pingback: Noe Conner

  • Pingback: Luther Wu